Just like I told Jason, I wouldnt be doing this if I didnt think it will work. I am confident in our abilities handle this. Both of us are well seasoned in running businesses. We understand that you cant predict whats going to happen with absolute certainty, and we understand that not everyone is going to jump on the OMA bandwagon at first. Even if we dont have a banner year the first season, I am very very confident that it will grow. Just like Im confident in the Battle for Ohio series growing. Jason and I wouldnt be putting our reputations on the line, if we didnt think it could be done. Im not ruining what I have going by cancelling/giving up on OMA, if things dont work out to our expectations. We are not OMG.
It will work, I will prove my critics wrong.
That is a winning business strategy which will yield the best long term outcome. It promoters would apply that philosophy to working for the patronage and support of quad racers, they would not be so baffled as to why when they throw an occassional crumb to quads that has little advance promotion through bike only patrons, and bike only websites, that they get such a poor turnout, as though quads are breathlessly following these tracks in hopes that some day they will have the privilege of spending their money where they are not wanted.
I see this as a big win for the bikers, and granted, the bike only tracks have nothing to lose. I can't help but wonder if Malvern has thought this through as far as how it will affect their quad patronage, or whether they care. They were one of the most popular CRA quad tracks simply because they welcomed and served that market well, but to suddenly tell these loyal quad racers that under new ownserhip, they now have to pay an OMA membership, for which they will have one track and five events, they get no CRA points,(and a 2nd track MIGHT let them ride). This might not have the same appeal to them. I doubt that this was ever considered, but the perception will be that the new owner of Malvern has thrown quad riders under the bus, even though they will "still be welcome to ride there". The only solution I see is to have more tracks within the OMA to have something to actually offer to quad racers, or run the quad portion of the race program at Malvern as outlaw races. Serious quad racers who count points will not follow you. You'll basically keep the guys who only race at Malevern, and don't count points. Sounds like the opposite of the bike market you were shooting for. I believe either "solution" will result in a loss of quad patronage, but less of a loss than simply making them geta membership for a 5 race season at one track.
If any of my perceptions are incorrect, you have the job or changing those perceptions to the public, because that is how it will be seen. That is how I see it, and I am impartial, and have no axe to grind. While I have great respect for all the promoters and they way they operate their tracks, and run their events, I think that most operations within the MX racing industry could benefit greatly from better marketing skills, and market analysis. If they did, they wouldn't all be competing for the same small market pool of overtapped racers without looking at the huge potential untappend. I don't see this as expansion of the sport. I see it as more fragmenting. I respect your right to follow your dreams, but we cannot pretend the unintended consequences not not exist.