OK, I took 15 days off PR and yesterday when I heard about this I knew I would have to post... Damn knit hats...
Hansen and the AMA, my two favorite subjects.
The "career" number system has been a joke since it began. I know it was started to make it easier for the average Joe to identify the riders. Much like the #43 in NASCAR will forever be one King no matter who ever runs it. The problem is the written rule. Or lack thereof. It is MY understanding that once your number was established, then it was yours until you do not score points in a calendar year. Once you retire then that number can be assigned to someone else. Sounds pretty simple until you add in the crybaby riders and the directionally challenged AMA. There have been dozens of changes by both the riders and the AMA. Look at the Dung. He was CAREER number 10... until 5 came open... Hot Sauce, number 9 and never turned a lap for a whole year, comes back and he still gets 9, WHY? The Laser twins (sorry, never going to live that one down) get 800 and 801... Forever? Heck, if Pastrana ever throws a leg over a bike again you can bet his next broken bone he will be 199. Now the AMA tells the Douche bag, knit hat wearing, I got most of my rides based off my last name Josh Hansen that he has to ride the 57 because that is the number he earned? I thought Plessinger was #57? Guess that was for his "I have not made it big yet" career.
The number 100 to 109 use to be reserved for big name riders that did not score points in the previous year due to injury and or factory guys coming over from the GP's. Guys like the great 22 who ran the 109 (If I remember correctly) then he earns enough points to get the 22 from... heck I don't remember who had it before him. So, I guess what I am saying is either you have a rule for career numbers or you don't. This is where I lean to the Hansen side of the argument (there is a first) Why does the AMA tell him he has to change numbers if guys like Laser boy can still run 800? Knowing the AMA I am sure it comes down to the all mighty dollar. I don't know, but I would almost bet on it.
Then again, on the AMA side, or common sense side, Who cares about the number anyway? You really want to be identified by a number? No thank you (unless it is #1)
I say bag the whole "career number" crap and go back to the top 99 guys get a new number each year based on points. That way when you see the #9 you know it is a top notch guy and not just some washed up has been that is still stealing good rides from up and coming kids that have a future in the sport.
Now, on to the "riders union" statement. We have posted on this time and time again. It is next to impossible because you have young men that are already risking their life for a fainting chance of "making it big". Even if you could convince all the up can coming kids and the middle of the road guy to ban together for the grater good, it is not going to stop the big guys because they have contracts that says they have to ride. And the AMA, NPG and Feld would just go to the same type of format the GP's have adopted. No one goes to a pro race because Scott Champion or Josh Hansen is there. People want to see the Dung, Toe smack and the rest of the factory guys.
The riders do need a voice. Problem is, even if they had one, no one would hear them under the current set-up. We are in a very odd sport. If you think Pitracer is "cliquish", try the Pro level. You have a very small group of people pulling the strings. And they make it abundantly clear, you are not one of them.
I have looked at this from every possible angle. as a racer, fan and worker and the only way for the pie to be cut evenly (or even to get a slice) has to come from the AMA. This is why I have been so hard on them since I first posted. They HAVE to be the voice of the rider and not just another group with their collective hands out. I firmly believe in the concept of the AMA, but the perception (which we all know is reality) seems to be they are not in the riders corner.