Trump daddy

There was a lot of talk yesterday of Obama's press conference comments of Trump being unfit and unqualified to fill the position of President. And the media is echoing this slanted message and giving it front page news priority.

Their intention is to repeatedly prove just how unprofessional and un-political Trump is. Is Trump a Bozo? Yep! But he's also a strong leader, and an incredibly experienced businessman.

Amazing how eager they are to overlook how "unqualified" Obama was when he was ushered up to run for the office.
Obama is a creation of the Democrat party. He was fast tracked through the system because he was "electable". It was never leadership, that got him there, and he had no gubernatorial experience. But now he's an expert.
 
NQ1965 said:
Is Trump a Bozo? Yep!
Click to expand...
I am a hateful, miserable bozo that hates Washington DC. So a vote for BOZO, is a vote against Billary.
At least Trump calls it as he sees it, or at least is not afraid to be himself.

Why doesn't Obama wear his turban?

Why is Hillary trying to look like a woman?

My Pshych says I have to emotions, rage and suppressed rage......ha ha. I love politics!
 
Talk to anybody that worked for Ardac in Eastlake OH about Trump and how he creates jobs.
Owners had to sell at pennies on the dollar and layoff everybody because Donnie refused to
pay for the equipment Ardac put into his casino. Somewhere south of $3million.

He's talked about doing the same thing (not paying) to US treasury bond holders. Your grandma
maybe. Or your 401(k) maybe.
 
Trump urges Pooteen to hack Hillary's server.

"If he is talking about the State Department emails on her server, he is inviting a foreign
intelligence service to steal sensitive American government information. If he is talking
about the allegedly private emails that she destroyed, he is inviting a foreign intelligence
service to violate the privacy of an individual protected by the Fourth Amendment of the
American Constitution. Perhaps he doesn't know what he's talking about. Just a theory."
Michael Hayden, CIA and NSA director under George W. Bush
 
The best post-convention visual summation yet.

The-American-Scream-600x416.jpg


And the way things are going on this site lately, we need a PitRacer version of The Scream.
 
I'm not crazy about Trump either. BUT the other option is Hillary and I know she is a corrupt politician and an out right liar. A vote for a third party candidate is a waisted vote. They will never win. Trump is the only option unless you want more of the same, or more than likely worst than the last 8 yrs. If Trump can get done 1/10 of what he says that will be a huge move in a positive direction.
Manufacturing is what this country needs, nothing pays higher wages especially when you are talking about the people who are unemployed, The general laborer. The free trade agreement has Killed manufacturing in the US. Well along with stupid high taxes and regulations that are major overkill. Trump at least has that idea right. If you really care about the environment and the greenhouse effect then get those factories in foreign countries shut down. They have No evviromental regulations at all.
 
Our country is a house deeply divided. Likely to remain so, likely to get worse, and not exactly sure how we recover from that.

Folks that are supporters of the Clintons clearly have a different view on the past and current state of our country and politics. They clearly don't see our political system as a corrupt, manipulated mess.

These folks also must not have any concerns or worries over future Supreme Court vacancy picks, and this worries me the most at this point.

My grandkids are going to grow up in a much different country than I.
 
NQ1965 said:
These folks also must not have any concerns or worries over future Supreme Court vacancy picks, and this worries me the most at this point.

My grandkids are going to grow up in a much different country than I.
Click to expand...

They are worried that another 8 years of reupblifuck supreme court appointees would be a disaster.
The use of "originalism" as an excuse to impose religious precepts on all of us cannot be allowed.

Like your grandkids, your grandparents lived in a much different country than you and me.
Not sure how that is a problem in itself.
 
sturd said:
They are worried that another 8 years of reupblifuck supreme court appointees would be a disaster.
The use of "originalism" as an excuse to impose religious precepts on all of us cannot be allowed.

Like your grandkids, your grandparents lived in a much different country than you and me.
Not sure how that is a problem in itself.
Click to expand...

Ok, so neither party can be trusted with Supreme Court appointments, where's this take us?

Our grandkids will adapt to the screwed up mess, never really knowing what is was like before. But it changes us all. It changes everything. I guess I'm just a hopeless romantic for the nostalgia of everything that was great before, and that sucks now.
 
Last edited:
Why such a hate for religion and our nation's founding? So busy destroying the Constitution as we experience the loss of our civil society. Not to worry? Just collateral damage during fundamental transformation? Cronyism has made the process lucrative for all those involved. Without Constitutional protections, future generations will hopefully enjoy totalitarian rule while they are saddled with paying for their self serving predecessors. The irony is that those who supposedly loath religion, worship so easily at the altar of big government.
 
Last edited:
sturd said:
They are worried that another 8 years of reupblifuck supreme court appointees would be a disaster.
The use of "originalism" as an excuse to impose religious precepts on all of us cannot be allowed.

Like your grandkids, your grandparents lived in a much different country than you and me.
Not sure how that is a problem in itself.
Click to expand...

So Sturd, are there, or has there been any issues with the Clintons or the Dem party that you would find, or do find unacceptable?
 
How about being in public service for 30 years and acquiring $350,000,000 in wealth. Never once applied anything to GDP. ALL TAKEN FROM TAX PAYERS AND donations foriegn and domestic.

But she cares about children....
 
I first heard of this Clinton news story a few weeks back, and it just came up again today on Foxnews.
I won't attempt to cover it, just do a google search on :

"Lolita Express" and also on "Clinton-Epstein"
 
GeorgiePorgie said:
How about being in public service for 30 years and acquiring $350,000,000 in wealth. Never once applied anything to GDP. ALL TAKEN FROM TAX PAYERS AND donations foriegn and domestic.
Click to expand...

Giving speeches is a perfectly acceptable free market way to make money. If somebody is willing to pay for it and is happy afterwards, that's the way capitalism works. No worries.

Now if it's a scam that's a different story:
http://fortune.com/2016/05/07/trump-testify-university-lawsuit-post-election/
 
Speaking of GDP and federal expenditures, real data. Note that spending spiked during
the auto industry/financial industry save but is back down to normal historical levels.
 

Attachments

  • expenditures as percent of GDP_01.jpg
    expenditures as percent of GDP_01.jpg
    62.5 KB · Views: 658
Screw all of this! Which one of these two is going to open dirt bike parks in really bad areas with taxpayer money for adults to use for free on their stolen motorcycles instead of going to work at a job? Just trying to have some fun course but I can't argue for either of these people...sorry.

I will say I can't stand people that are still rich that were involved in a bankruptcy that effected average hard working people........... That is my 2 cents because it happened to me and it really sucked.
 
Or repeatedly test or outright break laws of the worst kind yet never get convicted or proclaim guilt. All the while others suffer life sentences.
 
sturd said:
Absolutely. Name a politician and I'll tell you something about them I don't like.
Click to expand...

But at what point do you change course with your dislike for a candidate?

Surely even you have a time where you base your decisions on principal.

Our history is loaded with flawed candidates that had no business as the Commander-In Chief and CEO of our country.

We're in uncharted waters here. The world has evolved and changed enormously around us.
You have a candidate who has forced, lied and cheated her way onto the final ballot, and then a second candidate (an extreme bozo) who is a product of the general public's frustration and anger of the egregious corruption and manipulation that allowed her and her predecessor to get this far in our political system. This election cycle is like the perfect train wreck.

Most of us grew up believing that as an American we should stand proud and firm for how this country came to be, and all things true and nostalgic of the Great Ole USA, despite the times we have lived and displayed in shameful ways. And we would always put up the best and brightest for leadership of the land. This is not where we are today.
 
Last edited:
sturd said:
Giving speeches is a perfectly acceptable free market way to make money. If somebody is willing to pay for it and is happy afterwards, that's the way capitalism works. No worries.
Click to expand...

The way pay-for-play cronyism works.

CH9IgINUMAAdqfC.jpg


But he Clinton's tax returns show they donate a good percentage of their income to charity. But it's their own charity, the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play, money laundering opertion. The Clintons are what is wrong with politics in the USA.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top